COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
AGCO vs VRT
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AGCO scored 49.8, VRT scored 74.1 — VRT leads.
Compare another set
AGCO
AGCO Corporation
49.8
$110.13 · $7.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
24.3
VRT leads
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co
74.1
$261.95 · $100.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestAGCO14.8x
- Fastest growthVRT+26.2%
- Strongest balance sheetAGCO0.66
- Highest qualityVRT86 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AGCO
stronger →← stronger
VRT
56
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
86
37
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
91
59
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
52
VRT is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AGCO
VRT
$330mC
FCF
$2.9bB
+1.7%C
Rev
+26.2%A-
0.66B
D/E
0.70B
14.8xA-
P/E
59.1xD
1.15B+
PEG
1.28B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AGCO
VRT
6% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
156% above
~16%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~42%/yr
-28%
1-yr DCF upside
-70%
-5%
5-yr DCF upside
-61%
+41%
10-yr DCF upside
-45%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AGCO
Why this score
- Buying back stock
VRT
Why this score
- Durable high returns
The companies
AGCOAGCO Corporation
Why now
Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery · market cap $7.7b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $143.78 — deep drawdown territory. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $122.47 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
VRTVertiv Holdings Co
Why now
Electrical Equipment & Parts · market cap $100.8b. Down 31% from 52-week high of $379.94 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. 26 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $338.15 (implying +29% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 36% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 169% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 59.1x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Down 31% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 2.08 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AGCO and VRT diverge
On the headline score the gap is 24.3 points in favor of VRT. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthAGCO 36.9 · VRT 90.8VRT +53.9
- QualityAGCO 56.4 · VRT 86.1VRT +29.7
- ValueAGCO 59.5 · VRT 52.0AGCO +7.5
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.