COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
AGCO vs IR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AGCO scored 49.8, IR scored 72.8 — IR leads.
Compare another set
AGCO
AGCO Corporation
49.8
$110.13 · $7.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
23.0
IR leads
IR
Ingersoll Rand Inc.
72.8
$79.99 · $31.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestAGCO14.8x
- Fastest growthIR+7.8%
- Strongest balance sheetIR0.48
- Highest qualityIR66 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AGCO
stronger →← stronger
IR
56
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
66
37
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
76
59
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
77
IR is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AGCO
IR
$330mC
FCF
$1.2bC+
+1.7%C
Rev
+7.8%B
0.66B
D/E
0.48B+
14.8xA-
P/E
33.1xC+
1.15B+
PEG
0.72A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AGCO
IR
6% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
66% above
~16%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~20%/yr
-28%
1-yr DCF upside
-45%
-5%
5-yr DCF upside
-40%
+41%
10-yr DCF upside
-32%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AGCO
Why this score
- Buying back stock
IR
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
AGCOAGCO Corporation
Why now
Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery · market cap $7.7b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $143.78 — deep drawdown territory. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $122.47 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
IRIngersoll Rand Inc.
Why now
Specialty Industrial Machinery · market cap $31.0b. Down 21% from 52-week high of $100.96 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.72 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $96.25 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 127% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 33x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AGCO and IR diverge
On the headline score the gap is 23.0 points in favor of IR. The widest single difference is Growth, where IR leads by 39.6 points.
- GrowthAGCO 36.9 · IR 76.5IR +39.6
- ValueAGCO 59.5 · IR 77.1IR +17.6
- QualityAGCO 56.4 · IR 65.5IR +9.1
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.