COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
AGCO vs EPAC
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AGCO scored 49.8, EPAC scored 78.6 — EPAC leads.
Compare another set
AGCO
AGCO Corporation
49.8
$110.13 · $7.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
28.8
EPAC leads
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
78.6
$37.15 · $1.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestAGCO14.8x
- Fastest growthEPAC+4.3%
- Strongest balance sheetEPAC0.44
- Highest qualityEPAC86 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueEPAC-12%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AGCO
stronger →← stronger
EPAC
56
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
86
37
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
61
59
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
92
EPAC is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AGCO
EPAC
$330mC
FCF
$112mC
+1.7%C
Rev
+4.3%C+
0.66B
D/E
0.44B+
14.8xA-
P/E
21.1xB+
1.15B+
PEG
0.34A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AGCO
EPAC
6% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
12% below
~16%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~4%/yr
-28%
1-yr DCF upside
+3%
-5%
5-yr DCF upside
+14%
+41%
10-yr DCF upside
+31%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AGCO
Why this score
- Buying back stock
EPAC
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
The companies
AGCOAGCO Corporation
Why now
Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery · market cap $7.7b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $143.78 — deep drawdown territory. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $122.47 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
EPACEnerpac Tool Group Corp.
Why now
Specialty Industrial Machinery · market cap $1.9b. 17% off the 52-week high of $45.00. PEG 0.34 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 22% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 120% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AGCO and EPAC diverge
On the headline score the gap is 28.8 points in favor of EPAC. The widest single difference is Value, where EPAC leads by 32.1 points.
- ValueAGCO 59.5 · EPAC 91.6EPAC +32.1
- QualityAGCO 56.4 · EPAC 86.2EPAC +29.8
- GrowthAGCO 36.9 · EPAC 61.4EPAC +24.5
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.