COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
AES vs CIG
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AES scored 55.4, CIG scored 83.0 — CIG leads.
Compare another set
AES
The AES Corporation
55.4
$14.77 · $10.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
27.6
CIG leads
CIG
Comp En De Mn Cemig
83
$1.92
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthAES+8.5%
- Strongest balance sheetCIG0.78
- Highest qualityAES59 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AES
CIG
-$1.7bF
FCF
$354mC
+8.5%B
Rev
+8.1%B
2.57D
D/E
0.78A
0.8xA
P/S
—
0.81B+
PEG
0.33A
—
P/E
6.2xA
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Model signals
AES
CIG
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
AESThe AES Corporation
Why now
Utilities - Diversified · market cap $10.5b. 16% off the 52-week high of $17.65. PEG 0.81 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $15.00 (implying +2% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 38% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
D/E 2.57 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Free cash flow is negative (-$1.7b) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk.
CIGComp En De Mn Cemig
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap n/a. Down 30% from 52-week high of $2.76 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.33 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $2.14 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Down 30% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Dividend payout 80% of earnings on a 9.2% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.