COMPARE · Data as of August 13, 2026
AEP vs KEN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AEP scored 62.4, KEN scored 61.6 — AEP leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. AEP's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but KEN's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
AEP
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
62.4
$125.38 · $68.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.8
AEP leads
KEN
Kenon Holdings Ltd.
61.6
$67.74 · $3.3B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AEP
stronger →← stronger
KEN
48
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
57
84
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
85
61
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
48
KEN is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AEP
KEN
-$2.4bF
FCF
-$26mF
+10.9%B
Rev
+16.1%B+
1.61C+
D/E
0.74A-
3.0xB
P/S
3.3xC+
2.09C
PEG
2.59C
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Model signals
AEP
Why this score
- Short track record
KEN
Why this score
- Cut its dividend
- Short track record
The companies
AEPAmerican Electric Power Company, Inc.
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap $68.3b. 11% off the 52-week high of $140.58. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $144.48 (implying +15% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 10% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. $68.3b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$2.4b) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk.
KENKenon Holdings Ltd.
Why now
Utilities - Independent Power Producers · market cap $3.3b. Down 29% from 52-week high of $95.93 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +16%, comfortably above the S&P median.
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$26m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Dividend payout 312% of earnings on a 6.0% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Trailing P/E 44x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AEP and KEN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 0.8 points in favour of AEP. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueAEP 60.7 · KEN 47.8AEP +12.9
- QualityAEP 47.7 · KEN 57.4KEN +9.7
- GrowthAEP 84.0 · KEN 85.1level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.