COMPARE · Data as of August 14, 2026
AEP vs CIG
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AEP scored 63.4, CIG scored 44.3 — AEP leads.
Compare another set
AEP
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
63.4
$125.60 · $68.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
19.1
AEP leads
CIG
Energy of Minas Gerais Co
44.3
$1.93 · $33.6B
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AEP
stronger →← stronger
CIG
47
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
66
84
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
15
64
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
90
CIG is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AEP
CIG
-$2.4bF
FCF
$195mC
+10.9%B
Rev
-3.1%D+
1.61C+
D/E
0.70B
3.0xB
P/S
—
2.12C
PEG
—
—
P/E
6.9xA
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AEP
CIG
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
1245% above
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
>60%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-92%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-93%
—
10-yr DCF upside
-93%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AEP
Why this score
- Short track record
CIG
Why this score
- Cut its dividend
- Short track record
The companies
AEPAmerican Electric Power Company, Inc.
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap $68.4b. 11% off the 52-week high of $140.58. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $144.48 (implying +15% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 10% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. $68.4b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$2.4b) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk.
CIGEnergy of Minas Gerais Co
Why now
Utilities · market cap $33.6b. Down 86% from 52-week high of $13.87 — deep drawdown territory.
Moat
ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Down 86% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Dividend payout 103% of earnings on a 11.8% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
AEP leads CIG by 1.7 points (63.4 to 61.7). A contrarian could still prefer CIG, which trades about 5% below our DCF fair value — a margin of safety the score doesn't reward. Note they play different roles — AEP screens as spec, CIG screens as value — so the model rewards different traits for each.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AEP and CIG diverge
On the headline score the gap is 19.1 points in favor of AEP. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthAEP 84.0 · CIG 14.7AEP +69.3
- ValueAEP 64.3 · CIG 89.6CIG +25.3
- QualityAEP 47.3 · CIG 66.1CIG +18.8
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.