COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
AEP vs CEPU
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AEP scored 63.3, CEPU scored 50.8 — AEP leads.
Compare another set
AEP
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
63.3
$120.94 · $65.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
12.5
AEP leads
CEPU
Central Puerto S.A.
50.8
$12.98 · $1.9B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthAEP+10.9%
- Strongest balance sheetCEPU0.33
- Highest qualityCEPU58 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AEP
stronger →← stronger
CEPU
48
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
58
84
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
44
64
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
94
CEPU is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AEP
CEPU
-$2.4bF
FCF
$56mC-
+10.9%B
Rev
+8.1%B
1.61C+
D/E
0.33A
2.9xB
P/S
—
2.15C
PEG
—
—
P/E
6.0xA
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AEP
CEPU
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
186% above
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~25%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-61%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-65%
—
10-yr DCF upside
-70%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AEP
Why this score
- Short track record
CEPU
Why this score
- Foreign reporter (ARS)
The companies
AEPAmerican Electric Power Company, Inc.
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap $65.8b. 14% off the 52-week high of $140.58. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $144.20 (implying +19% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 10% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. $65.8b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$2.4b) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk.
CEPUCentral Puerto S.A.
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap $1.9b. Down 30% from 52-week high of $18.50 — deep drawdown territory. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $24.01 (implying +85% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
ROE 3% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AEP and CEPU diverge
On the headline score the gap is 12.5 points in favor of AEP. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthAEP 83.9 · CEPU 44.1AEP +39.8
- ValueAEP 63.7 · CEPU 93.7CEPU +30.0
- QualityAEP 47.6 · CEPU 57.7CEPU +10.1
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.