COMPARE · Reviewed July 30, 2026
ADMA vs CDNA
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ADMA scored 85.1, CDNA scored 83.8 — ADMA leads.
Compare another set
ADMA
ADMA Biologics, Inc.
85.1
$8.67 · $2.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.3
ADMA leads
CDNA
CareDx, Inc.
83.8
$38.10 · $2.0B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ADMA
stronger →← stronger
CDNA
81
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
88
90
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
94
85
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
72
CDNA is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ADMA
CDNA
$108mC
FCF
$92mC-
+11.0%B
Rev
+34.4%A
1.11C
D/E
0.08B+
12.8xA
P/E
—
0.65A-
PEG
—
—
P/S
4.3xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ADMA
CDNA
36% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
71% above
~3%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~28%/yr
+21%
1-yr DCF upside
-53%
+57%
5-yr DCF upside
-42%
+133%
10-yr DCF upside
-22%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ADMA
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
- Earnings outpace cash
CDNA
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
ADMAADMA Biologics, Inc.
Why now
Biotechnology · market cap $2.0b. Down 58% from 52-week high of $20.46 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.65 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $17.00 (implying +96% upside).
Moat
Net margin 32% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 42% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Pharma moat is patent runway + pipeline depth — a single approved molecule funds the next generation of bets. Late-stage trials carry binary readouts that swing valuation 30%+.
Risk
Down 58% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Trial-readout binary — late-stage clinical trials carry approve/reject outcomes that swing valuation 30%+; the equity is effectively a portfolio of these binary events, not a steady cash-flow business.
CDNACareDx, Inc.
Why now
Diagnostics & Research · market cap $2.0b. 6% off the 52-week high of $40.47. Revenue growing +34% — in hypergrowth territory. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $35.40 (implying -7% upside).
Moat
Net margin 24% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Beta 2.43 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.