COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
ADMA vs ANIP
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ADMA scored 81.3, ANIP scored 79.6 — ADMA leads.
Compare another set
ADMA
ADMA Biologics, Inc.
81.3
$9.84 · $2.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.7
ADMA leads
ANIP
ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
79.6
$77.32 · $1.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestADMA14.1x
- Fastest growthANIP+30.9%
- Strongest balance sheetANIP1.05
- Highest qualityADMA84 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueANIP-44%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ADMA
stronger →← stronger
ANIP
84
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
66
77
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
94
83
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
81
ADMA is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ADMA
ANIP
$116mC
FCF
$173mC
+8.0%B
Rev
+30.9%A
1.11C
D/E
1.05C
14.1xA-
P/E
16.8xA-
0.60A-
PEG
1.26B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ADMA
ANIP
32% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
44% below
~4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-6%/yr
+14%
1-yr DCF upside
+58%
+47%
5-yr DCF upside
+80%
+117%
10-yr DCF upside
+118%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ADMA
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
- Earnings outpace cash
ANIP
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
ADMAADMA Biologics, Inc.
Why now
Biotechnology · market cap $2.2b. Down 52% from 52-week high of $20.46 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.60 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $17.00 (implying +73% upside).
Moat
Net margin 33% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 41% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Pharma moat is patent runway + pipeline depth — a single approved molecule funds the next generation of bets. Late-stage trials carry binary readouts that swing valuation 30%+.
Risk
Down 52% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Trial-readout binary — late-stage clinical trials carry approve/reject outcomes that swing valuation 30%+; the equity is effectively a portfolio of these binary events, not a steady cash-flow business.
ANIPANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Why now
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic · market cap $1.8b. Down 22% from 52-week high of $99.50 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +31% — in hypergrowth territory. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $108.38 (implying +40% upside).
Moat
ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 160% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. Pharma moat is patent runway + pipeline depth — a single approved molecule funds the next generation of bets. Late-stage trials carry binary readouts that swing valuation 30%+.
Risk
Trial-readout binary — late-stage clinical trials carry approve/reject outcomes that swing valuation 30%+; the equity is effectively a portfolio of these binary events, not a steady cash-flow business.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
The model slightly favors ANIP (83.9) over ADMA (82.4), primarily due to ANIP's perfect 100 Growth pillar, driven by its +37.0% revenue expansion (grade A). However, a contrarian might prefer ADMA for its significantly higher Quality pillar score of 82, suggesting more robust underlying business fundamentals compared to ANIP's 64. No structural caveats apply.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ADMA and ANIP diverge
On the headline score the gap is 1.7 points in favor of ADMA. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityADMA 84.1 · ANIP 66.2ADMA +17.9
- GrowthADMA 76.9 · ANIP 93.8ANIP +16.9
- ValueADMA 83.0 · ANIP 81.2level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.