COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
ADBE vs PRGS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ADBE scored 89.4, PRGS scored 74.5 — ADBE leads.
Compare another set
ADBE
Adobe Inc.
89.4
$275.30 · $109.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
14.9
ADBE leads
PRGS
Progress Software Corporation
74.5
$44.36 · $1.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestADBE15.7x
- Fastest growthPRGS+15.5%
- Strongest balance sheetADBE0.61
- Highest qualityADBE92 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valuePRGS-65%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ADBE
stronger →← stronger
PRGS
92
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
67
86
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
84
90
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
73
ADBE is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ADBE
PRGS
$10.3bA-
FCF
$305mC
+11.5%B
Rev
+15.5%B+
0.61C+
D/E
2.62D
15.7xA-
P/E
21.5xB+
0.66A-
PEG
1.40B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ADBE
PRGS
23% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
65% below
~2%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-21%/yr
+15%
1-yr DCF upside
+188%
+30%
5-yr DCF upside
+183%
+53%
10-yr DCF upside
+177%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ADBE
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
PRGS
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
ADBEAdobe Inc.
Why now
Software - Application · market cap $109.4b. Down 26% from 52-week high of $370.86 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.66 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 34 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $270.61 (implying -2% upside).
Moat
Net margin 29% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 63% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 142% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
PRGSProgress Software Corporation
Why now
Software - Infrastructure · market cap $1.8b. 6% off the 52-week high of $47.37. Revenue growing +16%, comfortably above the S&P median. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $55.80 (implying +26% upside).
Moat
ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong. Software economics — recurring revenue, embedded customer workflows, and high gross margin all compound the moat once a base account is won. Switching costs are the lever.
Risk
D/E 2.62 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ADBE and PRGS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 14.9 points in favor of ADBE. The widest single difference is Quality, where ADBE leads by 24.9 points.
- QualityADBE 92.0 · PRGS 67.1ADBE +24.9
- ValueADBE 90.4 · PRGS 73.1ADBE +17.3
- GrowthADBE 85.8 · PRGS 84.4level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.