COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
ADBE vs INTU
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ADBE scored 89.4, INTU scored 85.0 — ADBE leads.
Compare another set
ADBE
Adobe Inc.
89.4
$272.22 · $108.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
4.4
ADBE leads
INTU
Intuit Inc.
85
$361.87 · $99.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestADBE15.6x
- Fastest growthINTU+15.1%
- Strongest balance sheetINTU0.33
- Highest qualityADBE92 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueINTU-35%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ADBE
stronger →← stronger
INTU
92
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
86
86
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
90
90
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
80
ADBE is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ADBE
INTU
$10.3bA-
FCF
$7.8bB+
+11.5%B
Rev
+15.1%B+
0.61C+
D/E
0.33B
15.6xA-
P/E
22.1xB+
0.66A-
PEG
0.94B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ADBE
INTU
24% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
35% below
~1%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-1%/yr
+17%
1-yr DCF upside
+32%
+31%
5-yr DCF upside
+53%
+55%
10-yr DCF upside
+90%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ADBE
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
INTU
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
ADBEAdobe Inc.
Why now
Software - Application · market cap $108.2b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $370.86 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.66 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 34 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $270.61 (implying -1% upside).
Moat
Net margin 29% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 63% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 142% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
INTUIntuit Inc.
Why now
Software - Application · market cap $99.0b. Down 49% from 52-week high of $705.08 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +15%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.94 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 33 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $446.02 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
Net margin 22% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 22% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 169% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 49% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
The model favors ADBE (88.8) over INTU (87.5), driven by ADBE's superior Quality pillar score of 92 and signals of durable high returns. Yet, a contrarian could prefer INTU for its significantly lower implied growth rate of -4% per year, indicating less optimism is priced into its shares.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ADBE and INTU diverge
On the headline score the gap is 4.4 points in favor of ADBE. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueADBE 90.4 · INTU 80.1ADBE +10.3
- QualityADBE 92.0 · INTU 85.6ADBE +6.4
- GrowthADBE 85.8 · INTU 89.6INTU +3.8
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.