COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
ADBE vs BLSH
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ADBE scored 89.4, BLSH scored 31.2 — ADBE leads.
Compare another set
ADBE
Adobe Inc.
89.4
$275.30 · $109.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
58.2
ADBE leads
BLSH
Bullish
31.2
$30.41 · $4.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthADBE+11.5%
- Strongest balance sheetBLSH0.21
- Highest qualityADBE92 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueADBE-23%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ADBE
stronger →← stronger
BLSH
92
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
53
86
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
14
90
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
40
ADBE is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ADBE
BLSH
$10.3bA-
FCF
$112mC
+11.5%B
Rev
-2.1%D+
0.61C+
D/E
0.21B
15.7xA-
P/E
—
0.66A-
PEG
—
—
P/S
15.3xC
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ADBE
BLSH
23% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
76% above
~2%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~29%/yr
+15%
1-yr DCF upside
-57%
+30%
5-yr DCF upside
-43%
+53%
10-yr DCF upside
-15%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ADBE
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
BLSH
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
- Short track record
The companies
ADBEAdobe Inc.
Why now
Software - Application · market cap $109.4b. Down 26% from 52-week high of $370.86 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.66 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 34 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $270.61 (implying -2% upside).
Moat
Net margin 29% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 63% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 142% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
BLSHBullish
Why now
Software - Infrastructure · market cap $4.6b. Down 59% from 52-week high of $74.98 — deep drawdown territory. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $38.44 (implying +26% upside).
Moat
Software economics — recurring revenue, embedded customer workflows, and high gross margin all compound the moat once a base account is won. Switching costs are the lever.
Risk
Down 59% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. P/S 15.3x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard. ROE -57% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ADBE and BLSH diverge
On the headline score the gap is 58.2 points in favor of ADBE. The widest single difference is Growth, where ADBE leads by 71.5 points.
- GrowthADBE 85.8 · BLSH 14.3ADBE +71.5
- ValueADBE 90.4 · BLSH 40.5ADBE +49.9
- QualityADBE 92.0 · BLSH 52.5ADBE +39.5
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.