COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
ACI vs SFM
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ACI scored 46.0, SFM scored 65.9 — SFM leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. SFM's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but ACI's are as of February 2026 — a 4-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
ACI
Albertsons Companies, Inc.
46
$12.38 · $6.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
19.9
SFM leads
SFM
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
65.9
$81.08 · $7.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestSFM15.5x
- Fastest growthSFM+7.2%
- Strongest balance sheetSFM1.40
- Highest qualitySFM76 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueACI-23%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ACI
stronger →← stronger
SFM
53
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
76
42
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
68
43
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
55
SFM is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ACI
SFM
$527mC+
FCF
$357mC
+3.5%C+
Rev
+7.2%B
9.74D
D/E
1.40C+
77.4xD
P/E
15.5xA-
1.27B
PEG
1.80C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ACI
SFM
23% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
2% below
~-3%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~5%/yr
+29%
1-yr DCF upside
-3%
+30%
5-yr DCF upside
+2%
+30%
10-yr DCF upside
+11%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ACI
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
SFM
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
The companies
ACIAlbertsons Companies, Inc.
Why now
Grocery Stores · market cap $6.0b. Down 38% from 52-week high of $20.00 — deep drawdown territory. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $14.19 (implying +15% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
D/E 9.74 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Trailing P/E 77.4x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Down 38% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
SFMSprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
Why now
Grocery Stores · market cap $7.6b. Down 45% from 52-week high of $147.16 — deep drawdown territory. 14 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $94.64 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
ROE 34% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Down 45% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ACI and SFM diverge
On the headline score the gap is 19.9 points in favor of SFM. The widest single difference is Growth, where SFM leads by 25.7 points.
- GrowthACI 42.3 · SFM 68.0SFM +25.7
- QualityACI 53.1 · SFM 76.2SFM +23.1
- ValueACI 43.5 · SFM 55.3SFM +11.8
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.