COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
ABG vs DRVN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ABG scored 69.7, DRVN scored 58.7 — ABG leads.
Compare another set
ABG
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
69.7
$214.81 · $3.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
11.0
ABG leads
DRVN
Driven Brands Holdings Inc.
58.7
$13.17 · $2.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestABG8.0x
- Fastest growthDRVN+7.6%
- Strongest balance sheetABG1.41
- Highest qualityABG69 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueABG-76%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ABG
stronger →← stronger
DRVN
69
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
41
58
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
74
85
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
66
ABG is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ABG
DRVN
$669mC+
FCF
$134mC
+4.1%C+
Rev
+7.6%B
1.41C+
D/E
2.66C
8.0xA
P/E
13.3xA-
0.60A-
PEG
0.93B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ABG
DRVN
76% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
25% below
~-23%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~5%/yr
+263%
1-yr DCF upside
+8%
+323%
5-yr DCF upside
+34%
+430%
10-yr DCF upside
+82%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ABG
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
DRVN
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
ABGAsbury Automotive Group, Inc.
Why now
Auto & Truck Dealerships · market cap $3.9b. 18% off the 52-week high of $263.38. PEG 0.60 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $254.20 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 131% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Net margin 2.8% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
DRVNDriven Brands Holdings Inc.
Why now
Auto & Truck Dealerships · market cap $2.2b. Down 33% from 52-week high of $19.74 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.93 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $16.61 (implying +26% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
D/E 2.66 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Currently unprofitable (margin -15.1%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 33% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ABG and DRVN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 11.0 points in favor of ABG. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityABG 69.1 · DRVN 41.0ABG +28.1
- ValueABG 84.5 · DRVN 66.3ABG +18.2
- GrowthABG 57.9 · DRVN 74.3DRVN +16.4
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.