COMPARE · Reviewed August 3, 2026
ABG vs CVNA
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ABG scored 71.7, CVNA scored 75.1 — CVNA leads.
Compare another set
ABG
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
71.7
$227.97 · $4.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.4
CVNA leads
CVNA
Carvana Co.
75.1
$66.13 · $98.4B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ABG
stronger →← stronger
CVNA
69
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
68
69
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
96
77
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
65
ABG is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ABG
CVNA
$669mC+
FCF
$929mC+
+4.1%C+
Rev
+54.0%A
1.41C+
D/E
1.11B
8.5xA
P/E
35.0xC
0.66A-
PEG
0.72A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ABG
CVNA
74% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
351% above
~-21%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~56%/yr
+229%
1-yr DCF upside
-83%
+282%
5-yr DCF upside
-78%
+376%
10-yr DCF upside
-67%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ABG
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
CVNA
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
The companies
ABGAsbury Automotive Group, Inc.
Why now
Auto & Truck Dealerships · market cap $4.2b. 13% off the 52-week high of $263.38. PEG 0.66 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $256.20 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 131% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Net margin 2.8% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
CVNACarvana Co.
Why now
Auto & Truck Dealerships · market cap $98.4b. Down 32% from 52-week high of $97.38 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +54% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.72 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $82.83 (implying +25% upside).
Moat
ROE 39% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $98.4b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Down 32% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 3.49 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 35x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.