COMPARE · Data as of August 28, 2026

AAT vs RYN

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AAT scored 60.0, RYN scored 59.0 — AAT leads.
Compare another set
AAT
American Assets Trust, Inc.
REIT - Diversified · Financial strength
74.6Fin
$22.43 · $1.7B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
1.8
AAT leads
RYN
Rayonier Inc.
REIT - Specialty · Financial strength
72.8Fin
$20.38 · $6.1B
fundamentals as of
  • Fastest growthAAT-4.7%
  • Strongest balance sheetRYN0.36
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD74.6/ 100 · FIN STRENGTHPEER MEDIANREIT74.6
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD72.8/ 100 · FIN STRENGTHPEER MEDIANREIT72.8
YieldAAT6.0%RYN5.0%
RevAAT-4.7%RYN-51.0%
D/EAAT1.62RYN0.36
AAT
RYN
6.0%A-
Yield
5.0%A-
-4.7%D+
Rev
-51.0%F
1.62C
D/E
0.36A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
AATAmerican Assets Trust, Inc.
REIT - Diversified · $22.43 · beta 0.98
Why now
REIT - Diversified · market cap $1.7b. 14% off the 52-week high of $25.97.
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Dividend payout 453% of earnings on a 6.0% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Net margin 4.1% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 2% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
RYNRayonier Inc.
REIT - Specialty · $20.38 · beta 0.90
Why now
REIT - Specialty · market cap $6.1b. Down 25% from 52-week high of $27.06 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -51% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 6 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $24.83 (implying +22% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Revenue contracting -51% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Dividend payout 232% of earnings on a 5.0% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. ROE 2% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.