COMPARE · Reviewed August 3, 2026
AAPL vs LPL
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AAPL scored 53.2, LPL scored 24.9 — AAPL leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. AAPL's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but LPL's are as of December 2009 — a 201-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
AAPL
Apple Inc.
53.2
$303.42 · $4.5T
fundamentals as of
Score gap
28.3
AAPL leads
LPL
LG Display Co., Ltd.
24.9
$3.07 · $3.1B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AAPL
stronger →← stronger
LPL
84
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
43
76
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
98
24
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
3
AAPL is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AAPL
LPL
$136.7bA
FCF
-$372mF
+14.2%B+
Rev
+23.1%A-
0.78C+
D/E
—
34.8xB
P/E
—
2.46C
PEG
6.56D
—
P/S
0.2xA
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AAPL
LPL
112% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~25%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
-56%
1-yr DCF upside
—
-53%
5-yr DCF upside
—
-48%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AAPL
Why this score
- Durable high returns
LPL
Why this score
- Short track record
- Foreign reporter (KRW)
The companies
AAPLApple Inc.
Why now
Consumer Electronics · market cap $4.5T. 12% off the 52-week high of $344.57. Revenue growing +14%, comfortably above the S&P median. 41 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $323.28 (implying +7% upside).
Moat
Net margin 28% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. FCF converts 106% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. $4.5T market cap places it among the largest companies in the sector — distribution, R&D, and customer-acquisition costs amortize across a base peers can't replicate.
Risk
Trailing P/E 35x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
LPLLG Display Co., Ltd.
Why now
Consumer Electronics · market cap $3.1b. Down 47% from 52-week high of $5.83 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +23%, comfortably above the S&P median.
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$372m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Down 47% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.